2 comments Saturday, November 7, 2009

It's that time of year again, when I can't open a paper or glance at a web site without being innundated by how WONDERFUL adoption is and isn't it too bad we don't have more of it.

Sigh.

Forget the rainbows and fluffy animals. Others have mentioned this, and I believe also, that it would be far more effective to spend November analyzing the less savory sides of adoption.

Such as honoring Strange And Mournful Day, when mothers take time to contemplate how the adoption industry robbed them of their children, their dignity, and their self-respect.

Or reviewing how supposedly respected organizations like Catholic Charities can so royally screw up their (expensive) intermediary services that purportedly "help" adoptees and birth relatives reconnect. (90% success rate?! I want to hear how many applications got dropped on the floor a la the Illinois Confidential Intermediary Service. Likewise, I bet CC is also pre screening to insure success before accepting participants--skews the figures nicely.) You've got to wonder what CC is trying to conceal, that they're refusing to help straighten out this appalling situation. Don't tell me the law doesn't allow it, that's a cop-out similar to "I was just following orders".

What about donor-conceived people who have no access to their medical records? What about cases like the sperm donor who passed on a life-threatening genetic condition? Doesn't anybody give a damn that we are creating human beings willy-nilly with no regard for their rights as human beings? I don't mean embryos, I mean the rights of real-live people who are suffering because others want to conceal errors and misdeeds.

How about discussing the strange case of the birth mother so upset at being contacted by the child-now-adult she gave up for adoption that she feels the need to plaster her story all over the place, in some kind of insane attempt to... do what? Garner sympathy? Destroy any hope of open records? Demonstrate how ungrateful we adoptees are, especially those of us who *gasp* search? Because being adopted automatically turns us into crazy stalkers, it's right there in the Player's Handbook. Oh, and our heads spin 360 while we projectile vomit, too. But genealogy is A-OK if you're, say, the First Lady, or anybody else for that matter. Now, gimme back my dice so I can keep playing the D&D version of Adoption Stereotypes. I've got a new character to roll:
THE PSYCHO BIRTH MOTHER

Strength: Limitless
Intelligence: Questionable
Charisma: 18 (+30 to News Media)
Weapon: +10 Glaive Of Victimization
Armor: Shield Of Anti-Reflection

When confronted with the Stalker Adoptee, the Birth Mother Promised Confidentiality morphs into the Psycho Birth Mother. Not only has she never regretted her decision, she's the one being victimized and wants only to maintain her privacy, which is why she touts her story to any News Media she can find. Her siren call is: "Don't open the records! It'll destroy women like me!" Ignoring her sister birth mothers, who may actually (horrors!) desire and seek contact with their offspring, she hides in plain sight, turning any adoptees who cross her path back into Perpetual Children. The Psycho Birth Mother refuses to look at herself in a mirror, because deep down she knows what she's doing is wrong.
As I said on Osolomama's blog, if women don't want the offspring they gave up for adoption to contact them, then they ought to support open adoption records. Because as it stands in closed records states, the only way for adoptees to obtain info is to contact their birth mothers. (And no offense intended by my use of that term; I'm using it strictly for search engine purposes. As far as I'm concerned these women are mothers, no adjective.)

Personally, November is very hard for me. For one thing, it's my daughter's birthday. She is my eldest and the very first biological relative I ever saw in the flesh. That is so messed up I cannot even begin to tell you. So to have Adoption Awareness Month be the same as the anniversary of her arrival is really difficult. The last thing I need are painful reminders that she and my son are the only biological relatives I may ever know. I am also irate that the whole adoption thing spoils my ability to be able to enjoy her birthday. This month should be all about HER, turning six and getting pink princess presents. She shouldn't have to have a mother who's distracted by fighting the ghosts of adoption past, present and future. Adoption affects my kids, too, and they had nothing to do with it!

It's also that time of thanksgiving, of being grateful... and I am damn sick of being told, as an adoptee, to be grateful. It's a time of family and since I've been disowned from my adoptive family and denied existence by my birth family, that only makes it worse. I could tell you the reason I haven't blogged much lately is because I'm busy with work and other things. It's even true. But the other reason is that I am so effing sick of adoption at this time of year that I can't think straight.

Thank goodness for Doctor Who or I might not make it through this year. I'm planning to enjoy the last episodes of the Tenth Doctor to the fullest, and I don't need adoption casting a pall over my escapism, thank you very much. In fact, adoption is the reason for it.

Adoption might as well be a rusty knife in my stomach. It's hard to tell what hurts worse, going in or coming out, but either way it'll poison you for life.

Yeah, I need a whole month to be reminded of that.

16 comments Thursday, October 22, 2009

Osolomama's recent post, Adoption: When Satan Doesn't Want You To, brings up the disturbingly increasing trend of fundamentalist Christians who are adopting so as to indoctrinate children into their particular flavor of Christianity. Before I get into this, let me point out that I don't have a problem with Christianity per se. I do, however, have a problem with ANY religion that attempts to impose itself upon others, especially children who have no ability to stand up for themselves.

Witness (heh) some of these quotes from evangelicals attempting to justify their actions:
  • The Lord is calling them to that ministry.
  • [God] predestined the path of the child by adoption.
  • Adoption is war because Satan and unseen beings contest it. They oppose adoption . . .
(Shouldn't that be a corellary to Godwin's Law: that if you bring up Satan in an argument it's automatically over?)

But what is most horrifying is the quote in the comments, from an adoptive parent's blog:
“we also have the advantage of understanding our host culture’s worldview and their very deep superstitious beliefs. thus, we were not surprised that sterling was given to us with a jade luck charm – a buddhist charm meant to bring good luck, fortune and protection. we, however, know that this charm is associated with spiritual forces meant to keep people in bondage. thus, we smiled and accepted it as we should, and then later went to the park, broke it, and threw it into the pond, and prayed for our sterling that all spiritual bondage over him would be broken. these spiritual forces are alive and real, and manifest themselves in more obvious ways (but with the same degree of power) than in the west, but we know that the power and grace of the God who created the heavens and the earth is infinitely greater than the forces of evil.”
On behalf of the adoptee in question, I am F---ING PISSED. These adopters had absolutely no business breaking that charm, which the adoptee might very well have cherished throughout his life as a tangible link to his past. This isn't about "breaking the spiritual bondage over him", it's about imposing their own flavor of spiritual bondage, not to mention their claim on him to the utter exclusion of his birth parents. And since when is Buddhism evil? Do they even know the first thing about Buddhism? To make the child witness this... what a horrific thing to do, telling the kid his culture and heritage is evil, which by extension means his birth family and he, himself, are also. How the hell do people like this pass home studies? (Never mind. We all know home studies aren't worth crap.)

People like this scare the, ahem, bejesus out of me. If you don't believe exactly what they believe, you are E-VIL. Is that really what a Christian savior and a loving God would want? Don't you think there's room in God's creation for a little Buddhist peace, or Jewish prayer, or Wiccan love? I pray that any adoptee who has the misfortune to be adopted by such perverse indoctrinators finds it within themselves to seek out their own spirituality, whatever that may be. As long as we all try our best to be good, kind, compassionate people, it doesn't matter if we pray to God or Goddess or the Spaghetti Monster. Geez, didn't you people read The Chronicles Of Narnia (written by a Christian, no less):
For I [Aslan] and he [Tash] are of such different kinds that no service which is vile can be done to me, and none which is not vile can be done to him. Therefore, if any man swear by Tash and keep his oath for the oath's sake, it is by me he has truly sworn, though he know it not, and it is I who reward him. And if any man do a cruelty in my name, then, though he says the name Aslan, it is Tash whom he serves and by Tash his deed is accepted.
If you can't be open-minded about the culture and religion from which the child comes, you have no goddamn business adopting!

11 comments Tuesday, October 13, 2009

I doubt few people in the adoption reform community are surprised to hear that Catholic Charities, that bastion of super-secrecy, made a mistake in connecting an adoptee with his biological family.
More than three decades after Ryba and Butler gave up their baby son to Catholic Charities of Trenton, N.J., for adoption, and four years after the agency facilitated their "reunion" with Bloete, genetic testing revealed last year that none of them are related.

Lisa Thibault, a spokeswoman for Catholic Charities of Trenton, acknowledged that the situation is "tragic," and that a "mistake" was made somewhere. But she said the agency has done all it is legally able to do for them.
I'm sure CC charged a hefty fee for this botched "reunion". That's how confidential intermediaries work: You pay, they supposedly search and find. But the problem is, there are no checks and balances to ensure that you get what you paid for.

I've written extensively about my own experience with Illinois' confidential intermediary program (here and here), which remains the only state-sanctioned method by which adult Illinois adoptees may attempt to gain access to their records. The word "confidential" is a euphemism for "hiding in the shadows". Their policies and procedures are secret; even participants are not allowed to know what is done on their behalf. Which means if mistakes are made, you might never find out about them. In my case, my identifying information was given to my birth mother without my consent... meaning their policies are more confidential than the privacy of participants. What does that tell you about the priorities of such programs? It's a back-door method of making more money off adoptions. Seal the records, then charge later for access to those very same records. It's not commonly known by the general public but everybody in the adoption reform community knows how the game is played.

Cases like these are exactly why entire concept of confidential intermediaries needs to be chucked. Why should we trust third parties to act on our behalf when we have no way to verify their actions? Sealing adoption records and falsifying birth certificates only breeds these kinds of mistakes, and provides fertile ground for profiteering. Instead, all birth certificates should bear the truthful information of one's origins, with adoption certificates verifying the facts of the adoption, and every single adult in this country, adopted or not, should be able to obtain their original, unaltered birth certificate for the same minimal fee. I spent thousands of dollars trying to get my records, just as these people have spent thousands trying to accomplish what Catholic Charities should have done in the first place.

We need to abolish confidential intermediaries in favor of open adoption records.

See also:
And let's note that reformers in New Jersey have been fighting to open adoption records. There's a petition here if you want to sign it to help the cause.

13 comments Thursday, October 8, 2009

This month's Grown In My Heart blog carnival is about names. I've blogged about names before. It's said that to know someone's true name is to have power over them. That is never more true when an adoptee's birth name is hidden from them.

Growing up, I hated the name my adoptive parents chose for me. It wasn't ME. It was the person they wanted me to be, the child they never had. When I got married I changed it to one I preferred. I might have changed it to my birth name, had I known it at the time. Apparently I don't have an official name on my original birth certificate, not even "Baby Girl", but in our brief anonymous correspondence my birth mother told me what she called me in her mind. But that name, also, is not mine. It's the person I might have been if I had been raised in my original family. So I'm glad I picked a third name that is neither adoptive nor birth but uniquely my own.

Still, the re-naming of adoptees bothers me. A while back I posted about a couple who is effectively replacing their deceased child with an adoptee. They gave this Chinese girl an Irish name, when she is old enough to know her Chinese one. Being adopted causes enough identity confusion without having your name taken from you.

It seems like a lot of adoptees change their names, either to take back their birth names or to do what I did and re-name themselves entirely. I see this as a reclaiming of our destinies, a way to have a choice in something that, for us, was choiceless. I respect adoptive parents who make their adoptees' original names part of their adoptive names. It's a nice way to synthesize both. But, I think we as adoptees have to forge our own destinies, and for some of us re-naming ourselves is part of that. The first time I tried to re-name myself, I was in third grade and tried to get everyone to call me a nickname based on my initials. The second time, I was in high school. The third time was when I took on the name by which people know me today. Names, for many adoptees, seem fluid. Perhaps it's because there is often this assumption, sometimes true, sometimes not, that we must reshape our identities for the benefit of the people around us lest we be "rejected" once more. Adoptees are very, very good at putting on the masks of expectations, and our names are part of that.

There is also this notion that if we adoptees know the names of our birth parents, that somehow armageddon will insue. This is another way in which names are used as power over others. The adoption industry uses our birth names and the names of our biological relatives to maintain control over us, even after we become adults.

When it came to naming my own children, I had a hard time. I wanted to give them names that would reflect their heritage from both me and their father, but I had nothing to offer from my side. So I picked first names that were vaguely Irish, that being the only heritage I was aware of at the time, and middle names from my husband's family. I wish I knew some names on my birth family's side so I could have considered those. Some people might think that's wrong. I don't see why. People name children after family members all the time, but if you're adopted it's like you're suddenly a crazed stalker merely for suggesting it.

One thing that greatly annoys me is that I cannot get rid of my maiden name, my adoptive parents' surname. It appears on my children's birth certificates, for crying out loud. Having been disowned by that family, I think I should have the right to change it. But there is no ability in the U.S. to change one's maiden name; it's considered something that never changes which is why it's used for identity verification. If they are allowed to disown me, I should be able to rid myself of their name, yet I'm stuck with it.

Names do, indeed, have power, and it's that power that the adoption industry wants to deny to adoptees like me, whose records are sealed. I want the power of my name returned to me in the form of access to my original birth certificate. Until then, I will remain less than those for whom the power of their names has always been their own.

15 comments Saturday, September 26, 2009

Katherine Heigl is adopting a child because she's "done with the whole idea of having my own children."

"I wanted to tell everybody so you don't think I stole a Korean baby," she said, laughing.
She's getting a lot of sympathy in the press for adopting a child with medical issues. Okay, I get that, nice humanitarian effort and all. BUT, baby selling is not a laughing matter. It is devastating to adoptees and birth families alike. And there is too much of a "rescuer" mentality here for my liking, as if she is trying to garner sympathy for being so big-hearted as to adopt a special-needs child. Is she going to give up her career to be available 24/7 to this child? Could she have accomplished the same thing by adopting, say, a 15 year old African-American boy, someone who is not as malleable as an infant?

I understand Heigl's character on Gray's Anatomy was a birth mom. I can't speak to that because my TV watching consists almost exclusively of science fiction (why bother with mainstream stuff when I'm busy plowing through the entirety of Hercules: The Legendary Journeys? Mmm.. Kevin Sorbo...) But I can tell you about Heigl's show from a few years back, Roswell, in which she played a half human/half alien hybrid whom--ahem!--had no access to her origins. In other words, the epitome of the sealed-records adoptee.

Let me quote some of Heigl's dialogue from the season 2 episode, "Surprise". In this scene Heigl's character Isabel has returned to her place of origin, the pod chamber where she and the other three human/alien hybrids awoke. She's just been through a really traumatic experience on her birthday, no less, and she begins a monologue to her birth mother.
Happy birthday, Isabel. I'm 18 today, Mother. October 25th, at least that's the day we've always celebrated as my birthday, but you're the only one who really knows the real day. I guess that's why I came to the only place I've ever seen you. I loved that day, but you disappeared and the picture of you is already fading and it's all I had. I was so happy because you were beautiful and warm and I even though I looked like you. But it wasn't you, not really. I don't know what you look like. Maybe I'll never know. It isn't fair, I need you! Where are you? God, it's my birthday, we should be together! How could you leave us? How could you tell us that important information about destinies and saving the world and then just disappear... answer me!
I can't watch that scene without crying because it pretty much sums up exactly what I'd like to ask my own mother every year on my own birthday.

I wonder if Heigl has equated this with her own adoption efforts. For her new daughter's sake, I hope she has. To watch Roswell is to gain a greater understanding of how much it sucks sometimes to be adopted, how much it especially sucks not knowing where you are from, who your people are, and what your history is... and what lengths others are willing to go through to keep you from knowing.

7 comments

What is it with advice columnists? I realize they're primarily for entertainment value (and yeah, I read them, which is why I came across this). But seriously, if they are going to put themselves in a position of helping people then they should, um, HELP people.

Dear Abby published the following this week in her syndicated column:

DEAR ABBY: For 15 years I was a happily married homemaker with a wonderful husband. "Duncan" and I attended church together, frolicked through the fields, even exterminated rodents together. He was my best friend. It was bliss.

Last year I found out my father had had an affair with Duncan's mother the year I was born, which makes him my half-brother! The news was too much for my husband. He had a fatal heart attack not long after. What should I put on his gravestone: "Loving Brother" or "Loving Husband"?

Grieving in Massachusetts

DEAR GRIEVING: Neither. How about "He was 'Everything' to me"? That should about cover it.
Instead of giving a flip answer designed to activate the sitcom-esque laugh track, Dear Abby (penned by the original Abby's daughter Jeanne Phillips) could have done some public good by taking the adoption industry to task for putting people in situations like this.

If we had open records--if every adoptee had the same access to their original birth certificates as the non-adopted, if birth mothers had free and clear access to all paperwork involved with their surrender--then families would be less able to lie about these things and people would not have to suffer the way this person clearly is.

Instead, our trauma is the punchline of a joke in the comics section. Add that to the list of things I wish I'd known before I was adopted.

If you want to write to Dear Abby and express your outrage:
Dear Abby is written by Abigail Van Buren, a k a Jeanne Phillips, and was founded by her mother, Pauline Phillips. Write Dear Abby at www.DearAbby.com or Box 69440, Los Angeles, Calif. 90069.
ADDENDUM: Okay, not quite adoption related (see comments), but still begs the question: How do we make sure people know their actual origins?


21 comments Friday, September 18, 2009

Grown In My Heart is doing a monthly Adoption Carnival encouraging everyone to discuss truths in adoption. I think this is a great idea. Here's my contribution to this month's topic, Things I Wish I'd Known Before I Was Touched By Adoption.

Be sure to check out what other bloggers are saying about this (the Mr. Linky icon at the bottom of GIMH's post), there are some really good conversations going on.

  • That being adopted is not a one-time event, but has life-long consequences.
  • That being adopted has had more of an impact on me than I may ever realize.
  • That sealed records, not my origins, make me a bastard.
  • That adoption stereotypes are such common assumptions it's difficult to even start discussing reform.
  • That no one was going to help educate my adoptive parents about being adoptive parents.
  • That my adoptive parents were going to lie to me about what they knew.
  • That my adoptive father was permitted to act as his own attorney in sealing my file.
  • That being adopted has an impact on future relationships.
  • That, despite being adopted as a newborn, I would still love and miss my birth mother for the rest of my life.
  • That being adopted as a newborn does not make me a tabula rasa.
  • That "your mother gave you up because she loved you" makes NO sense.
  • That my birth mother was likely not advised on all of her options.
  • That my birth mother might have been able to keep me if our society were more supportive of expectant mothers.
  • That trying to get your adoption records is like trying to pull your own teeth with one hand and a pair of rusty scissors.
  • That people who aren't touched by adoption are going to say, "Why don't you just get your records from the courthouse?"
  • That my birth mother is a real person, not just some nebulous entity not spoken of in polite conversation.
  • That intermediary programs exist to make money, not to help adoptees or birth relatives.
  • That my birth mother needed more help to open her heart to me than she was going to get from the intermediary program through which we eventually made contact.
  • That contacting my birth mother through an intermediary would result in being locked out of my records permanently (or until the law changes).
  • That "no" upon first contact through an intermediary often means no second chances.
  • That baby selling exists, and is thriving.
  • That agencies and adoption "professionals" often tout profiteering as charity.
  • That those same agencies double-dip by later charging adoptees and birth relatives for the same information they themselves sealed.
  • That the adoption industry is deeply corrupted.
  • That most people don't care.
  • That made-for-TV movies about adoption would make me cringe.
  • That I would dread my own birthday.
  • That being adopted means I am a second-class citizen and have to worry if I'll be able to get a driver's license or passport.
  • That being adopted severs me not only from my family, but from my culture and heritage.
  • That my mother would be too traumatized to ever acknowledge me.
  • That my father and any potential siblings may never know I exist.
  • That being angry about all of this makes me "anti-adoption", "anti-children", "pro-abortion", and an "ungrateful angry adoptee".
  • That being publicly angry makes me doubly so.
  • That my being adopted would have a continual impact not only on me, but on my children and theirs.

13 comments Saturday, September 12, 2009

It's four in the morning, and I can't sleep. I'm thinking about P.F.V. He was my dearest friend in high school, the person who got me through bad breakups and rough times with my adoptive parents. He was always there for me, the steadfast one, my white knight. The time we dated was one of the happiest in my life. But I screwed it up, and twenty years later I continue to be haunted by that.

He was tall and handsome, with dark hair and the brightest blue eyes you've ever seen. We met, of all places, at a church retreat, which was ironic because neither of us were particularly into church although we went to the same Catholic parish. I was at the retreat because my adoptive mother insisted I be confirmed, just like she insisted upon controlling everything else in my life. But in my own rebellious way I brought a copy of Heinlein's Stranger In A Strange Land along to keep me company. (Which I was reading, quite honestly, for the science fiction and not the sex. I prefer The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress.) This boy and I started talking science fiction and it was instant chemistry. He played a cherry-red guitar in the church band and could do a mean version of the bass line from Fleetwood Mac's The Chain. I'll always picture him with a gray cap on his head and an extra pick stuck through the strings. He was a tinkerer and could solder just about anything, which impressed me because I was always more of a software girl. He made me earrings out of old computer parts. I still have them. He became my confidant, my best friend and later my boyfriend--wonder of wonders for the geek girl who never got the guy.

Our breakup wasn't his fault, it was mine. There was this one incident that shouldn't have meant anything, and yet. thinking back on it, I think it was the catalyst that drove me to push him away. We were at a big celebration with his family, who had always been very accepting of me. By this point we were high school seniors and considered ourselves engaged. A picture was to be taken of his entire family, his parents and many brothers and sisters and their spouses. I posed, too, but his parents took me aside and gently explained that it was a family picture. I walked away, brimming with tears. He tried to console me, but somehow at that moment everything changed, not that I understood it at the time. I suddenly realized subconsciously that even if I married him I would never be truly part of his family, truly part of ANY family. My adoptive parents had always been horrible and I had no way to find my birth family who probably didn't want me, either. The wound cut deep, yet another rejection. A scant few months later I broke up with him in the worst possible way, cutting him out of my life so completely there would be no turning back.

Time gives one perspective, as does the research I've done over the years on what it is to be adopted and the crazy things adoptees sometimes do. But mostly, it was finding and losing my birth mother (again) that really crystallized this situation for me. I understand now what happened, and although it changes nothing, maybe young adoptees can learn from my experience and stop themselves before they make horrible mistakes like this.

I wish I'd known, growing up, about the impact of adoption on my life. I wish I'd realized that I was pushing him away out of fear of being rejected myself. Apparently it's something we adoptees sometimes do, sabotaging our relationships with the people around us. Now, I don't think all adoptees sabotage relationships, and I'm sure non-adoptees have issues with relationships and other aspects of their lives, too. But I think, as adoptees, we don't always consider the impact being adopted has on ourselves, especially when we're young. Knowing these things now doesn't excuse or condone what I did. I can't even offer him an apology because I don't think what I did can be forgiven. I betrayed him, betrayed our friends, ran away to college in another city and into the arms of the first man I found there, in what was perhaps a subconscious attempt to recreate the "sins" of my "wanton" birth mother as she had always been portrayed by my adoptive parents. I guess I wanted to prove that I was horrible enough not to deserve someone as good and kind as him. In many ways I feel guilty even writing this, like I have no right to remember him at all.

Later I legally changed my name to the one he called me, Triona, in honor and in penance, so that every time someone speaks my name I am reminded of what I did, and who I am. I don't feel I have the right to look him up and find out if he had a good life. I hope so. I hope he was able to move beyond the messed-up girl he once dated and find happiness.

Wherever you are, P.F.V., I'm sorry and I wish you the best, always.

4 comments Friday, September 11, 2009

In my previous post about excellent adoption articles, I can't believe I forgot this one, which is the most accurate public smackdown of the adoption industry I've seen in a long while, if ever.

For a corollary, check out Divine Caroline:
And here's another good article, which is about the addiction many adoption specialists and mental health practictioners have these days to so-called "attachment disorder", which I think I'll call DWA ("Driving While Adopted").

7 comments Tuesday, September 8, 2009

There have been a lot of articles lately that do an excellent job of describing what is wrong with adoption as it is practiced today. I'm sure I'll miss some but here is a list of those I have encountered recently. Many of these concern international adoption, but the lessons learned could be equally applied to domestic adoption. With so many articles like this, I wonder if we are seeing a change in the perception of adoption as 100% warm happy fuzzy rainbows. I hope so because I, for one, would welcome some fresh perspectives on the subject.