RSS

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Playing Games With Birth Certificates

An interesting Chicago Tribune article caught my eye:
Before undergoing sex-change surgery in 2007, Kari Rothkopf drove from her Wisconsin home to the vital records office in Springfield to ask about switching the gender on her birth certificate from male to female.

In August 2007, a clerk and her supervisor told Rothkopf, who was born in Dixon, Ill., that the birth certificate couldn't be changed because she had planned to have her sex reassignment surgery outside the United States. On Tuesday, Rothkopf, 36, and Chicago resident Victoria "Tori" Kirk, both of whom had their sex-change surgeries in Thailand, sued the State of Illinois.

Their lawsuit, filed by attorneys for the American Civil Liberties Union, called the denials a violation of state law and asked a judge to order that their birth certificates be changed.
These are people who WANT to change their birth certificates. The Illinois Dept. of Vital Records that says they can't is the same Illinois Dept. of Vital Records that so blithely changes adoptee birth certificates when we DON'T want them changed. The same ACLU that is advocating in favor of these citizens is the same ACLU that advocates against adoptee records access. Is anyone else choking on a heaping mouthful of irony?

Maybe the Dept. of Vital Records should provide transsexuals the ability to change their birth certificates for a tasty fee, just like they charge adoptees who attempt to access their original birth certificates. Or, even better, why not seal transsexuals' birth certificates, so their current-gender selves are denied access unless they go through a registry or intermediary to contact their previous-gender selves? Of course their previous-gender selves can file a denial, just in case their current-gender selves turn out to be stalkers. After all, it works for adoptees, right? (crickets chirping...)

(For all I know the state already has some way to amend the BCs for a price, since they're clearly in the business of mucking around with peoples' birth certificates. And on an off-topic note, I find it offensive that a word search at Chicago Tribune for "transsexual" brings up Google ads for "free sex offender search," "educator misconduct" and "clergy abuse.")

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

News From Illinois And Indiana

A few news tidbits:
  • The Alton, Illinois Telegraph published an article about the efforts of Illinois Open and the Green Ribbon Campaign to open adoption records in this state. I was interviewed for the article as were fellow Illinois adoptee bloggers Anita Field and Mary Lynn Fuller. There is a comments section if you'd like to add your thoughts to the discussion.

  • Anita and Mary have a new Illinois Open blog: illinoisopen.blogspot.com. Don't miss Anita's analysis of her experience with the Illinois Confidential Intermediary program.

  • And please visit the Indiana Open blog for more details on their call to action:
    Please write the legislators in Indiana and tell them NO to SB 280 and SB 303.

Friday, January 23, 2009

Dreading Birthdays: Thoughts On Adoption Depression

It's January in Chicago, cold and dark, and I'm dreading my birthday.

At this time of year I can't help thinking of my birth mother, pregnant with me, growing bigger and possibly more scared every day. She was twenty-five, a college graduate. I may never know why she felt she couldn't raise me, but after talking with other birth moms I can imagine. In some circles being a birth mom might as well be a life sentence, just like being adopted.

For adoptees, birthdays can be an ambivalent, worrisome or retrospective time, when we especially wonder about all the what-ifs and doubt our own identities. How can you build a self when your anchor was ripped out from under you? I've been struggling with that question all my life.

I remember one of my earliest birthdays. My adoptive mother, the socialite wannabe, invited the children of families she wanted to impress instead of my friends (not that I had many of those). This resulted in a mishmash of cliques and many awkward moments among the kids. Pictures of that day show me fiddling with my presents instead of playing all the nice games chosen for me to play. And that's why I didn't enjoy the party, or my birthday. Because on this day above all others, I was expected to like what I was told to like, do what I was supposed to do--in other words, be the perfect adoptee. Later I would go back to my room, "grateful" only for the chance to be alone with my books and the snow.

I didn't really start dreading birthdays until I started asking questions about my adoption, questions that were misdirected or answered with (as I later discovered) outright lies. Before that I just had this vague unease that got worse as the calendar crept toward January. I wonder if my birth mother suffers like I do, from what the shrinkwrappers call "seasonal affected disorder" but I believe is simply part of the human experience. One of the most shocking moments during my brief contact with my birth mother was her revelation that depression runs in our family, in fact one of my uncles suffers severely from it. Don't ask me what that means because it's all I've got. To be given that tidbit and then left in the dark makes me feel like spring will never come. Maybe depression was imprinted on me in the womb. It's in my blood, an unknown poison.

My depression has gotten worse since my birth mother bowed out mid-anonymous-conversation. When it comes to my birthday I don't really care about the onset of (gack) middle age. What bothers me is the reminder of my fate, the circled date on the calendar that says, hey, if the timelines had twisted this way or that, I could have wound up raised by my birth family or some other adoptive family. Things could have been better, could have been much worse. Maybe in some of those timelines I never searched, or never had to because the information was available to me. Maybe in some of those timelines I never lost my birth name. Maybe in some of them I didn't care, or ended my life because I couldn't stand not knowing. All of these thoughts are inextricably linked with my birthday.

If you Google "adoption depression" you'll find almost every single entry is about Post-Adoption Depression Syndrome... when you finally adopt that beautiful baby and can't figure out why you feel so low. I try to have sympathy for adoptive parents and prospective adopters, but for pity's sake! I went as far as page 10 and didn't see a single item relating to adoptees or birth relatives. That's how negated our feelings are. It is not societally acceptable for an adoptee or her birth mother to be depressed, especially on her birthday. Yet I have not talked to a single adoptee or birth mother who did NOT feel some level of depression about adoption at some point in their lives. Why is this ignored? Because it would destroy the picture-perfect world of adoption. Prospective adopters are not going to be so eager to pay big bucks for those Healthy White (or close enough) Infants if they realize how difficult adoption actually is, for themselves and others. The agencies gloss over the negativities with pretty euphemisms and shiny brochures, which is why adoptive parents end up with so-called PAD in the first place; it's a symptom of a much larger syndrome--adoption itself.

For me, January is trying to dig out of the chasm. Forget therapy; there's no DSM definition for assault by adoption, and my psyche is forever repelled by my adoptive parents' use of therapy to try to force me into the Good Adoptee mold. Not attachment therapy, thank the gods... wasn't around back then or it might have been part of the "cure" for my adoption. This is horribly common among American families, and adoptive families in particular: if the kid doesn't behave, better brainwashing through therapy. What we adoptees feel is perfectly normal, even if there are those who will moan and wail at us for calling ourselves (and their trophy adoptees) "bastards." Guess we'll have to fend for ourselves when it comes to digging our way out of adoption depression. Here are my shovels this year:
  • Spending time with my kids
    They're awesome. 'Nuff said.
  • Adoption reform
    Blogging is the best adoption therapy I've ever tried, second only to getting off my butt and writing letters to legislators and the media in support of open records.
  • Creative writing
    Fiction works best for me, but even an article about the dangers of the latest computer virus gets my blood pumping (or else I've been a geek way too long). Since we're on the subject, go patch your Windows computer against Conficker before you have a bad day.
  • Gardening
    Winter sowing is a blast and cures many of my January woes. Now I gotta dig up, heh, funds for more seeds (Geranium phaeum "Lily Lovell" and "Samobor"). And let's not forget this year's birthday present to myself: Echinacea "Summer Sky." Drool!
  • Twenty-two straight hours of The Flash
    I'd forgotten what I crush I had on him when I was a kid!
Despite my best efforts, depression lingers. The world stands locked in ice, and I'm up again at 3am, pondering my fate.

Saturday, January 17, 2009

Illinois: Still More Santa!

More coverage of the Santa campaign:
Please be sure to write in support of open adoption records in Illinois.

Praying For Irvin Groeninger/Adam Herrman

From one adoptee to another: wherever you are, I hope you're safe.

Please read Baby Love Child's ongoing coverage of this tragic case.

Saturday, January 3, 2009

Illinois: Santa Coverage!

Please contact these media outlets and let them know you support Adoption Reform Illinois' Santa campaign and unrestricted original birth certificate access for adult adoptees.

Friday, January 2, 2009

Why Registries and Intermediaries Are No Substitute For Open Adoption Records

I've mentioned this before, but since the WICS reporter asked Mary this specific question, I thought I'd reiterate. The reporter wanted to know why Adoption Reform Illinois is not satisfied with the Illinois Registry and Confidential Intermediary (CI) Program as a solution to the question of adoption records.

Registries and intermediaries are NO substitute for open adoption records. Why?

Number-one reason:
Additionally...
  • Registries and intermediaries are expensive.
    Here in Illinois it's a $95 registration fee plus $200 per search, and that's with the special "subsidy" (usually it's $400 a search). Compare this to $15 for a certified copy of a non-adoptee's birth certificate. Those who cannot afford these rates are locked out of the only procedure currently available for records access.
  • Registries and intermediaries are not accessible to everyone.
    As an adoptee born in one state and adopted in another I had to fight for years to use the Illinois CI program (and now wish I hadn't). Others are still caught in similar Catch-22s due to paperwork snafus, sunspots, or other silly details. States don't keep track of how many applications get rejected, so there is no way to know how many get dumped in the circular file.
  • Registries and intermediaries are ineffective.
    The Illinois Registry's match rate is just 13% through March 2008 (link opens PDF); other states are comparable. And intermediaries have no access to records outside their own state; if an adoption takes place across state lines or information resides elsewhere, their Super CI Powers don't work.
  • Intermediaries are no better at searching than anyone else.
    You are likely to get better results through a search angel, a volunteer who also has a personal connection to adoption and likely a more vested interest in helping, than an anonymous social worker who may not even be familiar with adoption, much less how to manage search and reunion. (Another example of confusing access with search.)
  • You have no control over your own search.
    These programs will not tell you what steps have been taken on your behalf, so in effect they take control of your search for you. If you have been searching on your own a while, want to see if you can put pieces together yourself, or even just want to verify that you are receiving the services for which you've paid, that decision is taken out of your hands.
  • There is no oversight or accountability.
    I mentioned how the Illinois CI program released my identifying information to my birth mother without my consent. I still have no "official" notification, going on two years, and no way for me to formally protest or file a grievance. These programs cloak their operations in the magic word "confidentiality," which also serves to hide any mistakes they may make. You can't even find out their standard procedures, or what information they are providing your contacted relative!
  • Open adoption records do not result in increased abortions or decreased adoptions.
    This is another assumption that has been proven false, time and again, as records are opened in more states. See the EBD's For The Records study.
  • Adults do not need third parties to manage their affairs.
    Adoptees and birth relatives are perfectly capable of negotiating contact with one another without the "helpful" interference of the government.

    In fact, I put forth that intermediaries may actually hinder the process by making it more complicated and overwhelming. If a birth mom is afraid of her secret becoming known, is she more likely to talk to a scary state worker or a gentle volunteer search angel? Keep in mind many of these women were threatened with legal action if they attempted to search. A CI coming along after all these years may resurrect that fear.
  • For those birth mothers who do want privacy, registries and intermediaries force the adoptee to contact them in order to gain information.
    When I signed up for the CI I didn't necessarily want to find my birth mother, I just wanted information and that is the only way, in Illinois and many other closed-records states, to obtain it. More confusing access with search.
  • Registries and intermediaries pre-penalize adult adoptees for something we haven't even done.
    Such laws assume ALL adoptees are potential criminals who only seek information in order to stalk birth family members. Could we please get rid of this stereotype? There are existing anti-harassment laws, and adoptees are no more likely to break them than anyone else. Our rights should not be denied to protect against "what-ifs."
Add to all this, registries and intermediaries are demeaning. How would you like to be told by the state that you are Not Worthy? I personally found the entire procedure humiliating as my life and intentions were combed for hidden meanings, all for a vague chance at the same information others can have without question. As Mary's experience at Vital Records shows, we're always on the other side of that locked door.

Let adoptees and birth moms have access to original birth certificates like everyone else. It would save the state oodles of money since they would not have to run those expensive registry and intermediary programs, and it is the only way to restore equality in a system that is far from equitable.

Santa, I'm still askin'. Please send me my original birth certificate!